The Tree of Knowledge

Keeping a library is like gardening, after a while an untended garden starts to grow wild, each bit of knowledge seeking its own path to the light.  Things grow, enervated by our interest, discarded, but containing a vitality of ideas, good or bad, which continue static until they are enervated again, and that energy carries those ideas further, to grow into forests of relevance or get choked out, discarded and burned.

I’ve kept both types of gardens, the ideal and the real, both wild and tame.  My current garden has grown wild, but I find that among the weeds, some strong ideas grow, and both good and bad.  The problem with information, knowledge, is that it can become idolatry, with all the foolish rubric idolatry so often runs to.

I’m up to pruning my garden, in part because of a recognition of that idolatry, and a desire to pay closer attention to the real gardens in my life, family, friends, community, work, home life, and living in the world at large, each of those real gardens represent an Eden, that is a mansion with many rooms.

I suppose some theorists, behavior modeling programmers and the like, have already explored this metaphor.  No doubt directory structure in older operating systems programming uses terminology of directory trees, code branches, file system leaves, and the like.

Which poses an interesting question for today.   Is electronically stored knowledge, static in the way printed knowledge is ? To which I supposed I would reply, of course it is, only the medium of stasis has changed.  This leads to the question, to what degree has interactive ‘stored knowledge’ given the ideology of organic information a different organic reality.

This I suppose is where the collective unconscious of our age has fattened on the new Mythology of Terminators, Matrix’s, and Multiverses.

It’s also interesting that our religious mythologies resonate with ‘tree of knowledge’ tales.

This is an impatiently cynical interpretation partially inspired by trepidation over jury deliberations in the Scooter Libby trial.

I think this whole ‘Scooter’ Libby Perjury and Obstruction of Justice case, in the leaking of CIA NOC Agent Valerie Plame’s identity, is Kabuki. It is the ‘exit strategy’ for Iraq, it is the germ of an idea that presented itself even as the ‘Mission Accomplished’ banner was being unfurled. Admit to the malfeasance and misconduct in going to war, allow the earnest and zealous process of law to sacrifice the requisite goats (in the Office of the Vice President, who no doubt are overdue their ‘just desserts’), make a public show of remorse for the wrongdoings, wait awhile, pardon the fall-guys who took a hit for the ‘Republic’, and continue with long term middle east plans.

Image of ‘moral and ethical America’ somewhat restored, long term goals still on track.

I’ll be convinced otherwise only when war-crimes tribunals follow subsequent investigations into the affairs of the Neo Con criminal racket, bringing to light the panopoly of conspirators and provacateurs. However such investigations and tribunals will probably never occur unless conducted at gunpoint as a result of foreign military intervention in the affairs of American ‘Zionist‘ Imperialism.

I can appreciate the deep need for there to be genuine heroes of duty, justice and honour, such as Patrick Fitzgerald represents, and I don’t want to diminish his hard work and dedicated clarity in the pursuit of this case. However well or ill suited Scooter Libby and Darth Cheney are to playing out their protagonisms, the trial itself is a bit of theatre, unlikely to pull back the obstinate rock under which many cruelly unwholesome creatures squirm.

Perhaps I am being too cynical in believing, that amidst the ocean of wrongdoing that the U.S. has committed, in states both foreign and domestic, that this case, serious as it is, cannot have come so far merely on legal merits, while other equally serious acts of mendacity go unchallenged. It is tempting to suspect some other underhanded agency or ambition at work.

While the indentured media dutifully whistles, piping inspirational accompaniement, and looking the other way, the real and serious nature of this trial proceeds, with predictable outcomes. However it is hard to believe that the findings of this trial, and any subsequent investigations that proceed from it, will budge foreign policy, as it regards the middle east, in the slightest.

The trial will be cathartic, but thats about it. The catharsis, once achieved will allow the troubled conscience of the irate populace to subside into their subservient consumer slumber, sated and passive once more, allowing the aristocracy of sophisticated avarice to resume their plunder and oppression without fear of ‘peasant uprisings’.

The sad history of the world continues, this latest chapter like a mafia biography writ large.

“For those who believe, no evidence is necessary, for those who don’t believe, no evidence is sufficient.”

This goes to the heart of interpreting matters of morality, whether religious or secular (there really is no difference, secular morality is as faith based as traditional ‘religious’ morality, the only thing that differs are the articles of faith)

When you are talking about morality, people believe certain actions or lifestyles are morally acceptable or unacceptable. Those beliefs are often based on how that person chooses to live their life, beliefs which are articulated in hindsight.

No argument, or evidence are going to sway a person, towards or away from acceptance of alternative lifestyle choices, since belief is a matter of how a person links together their interpretation of how they choose to live their lives, and what beliefs reinforce those choices.

Morality is about behavior, not religion. Religion, is an anglicized word for for binding, as in binding things together. Religio literally means ‘chain’ or links, as in what links this thing, or idea to that thing or idea. Religion plainly put is a ‘word’ describing the process by which people link their assorted beliefs together.

Morality is as inherent to humans as story telling, a form of social understanding whereby each generation forms a set of ‘trial and error beliefs’ about what ‘behavior’ is conducive to the ‘health of society’. Taboo’s are a precise example of this kind of moral formation.

There are common ‘universal’ taboos that form the basis of ‘natural law’, don’t kill, don’t steal, don’t cheat, don’t lie, etc., since each of these behaviors obervably cause problems for the society in which both the perpetrator, and those whose lives are affected by said ‘perpetrator’, live.

These taboos form however as a result of the physical realities of human life and biological necessity. The religious morality, or modern morality is a reflection of the lifestyles of the age. Whatever lifestyle leads more towards survival, as measured in purely biological terms, inevitably succeeds.

It’s not a question of superior reasoning, just simple stupid biology, and the sad history and semantics of human ’social’ accounting.

Faith and reason are functionally synonymous with awareness and will, heart and mind, they are the binary components of thinking beings.

We reason from our beliefs, and adjust our beliefs according to reason. But the two must co-exist.

To dispense with faith altogether is like saying human emotions are destructive, therefore we should get rid of them. Each of us ‘believes’ things we cannot see, or have not bothered to prove to ourselves. Faith is an operation of the mind, belief, not a construct of a particular religion.

In the context of religiously charged political dialogue and propaganda, I would say there are two hurdles.

Firstly doctrinal and literal interpretations of scripture and various sacred writings, used to provoke polarization on domestic policy and foreign policy.

Secondly the tendency for people to behave with a tribal ‘us vs. them’ tendency and operate from a position of arguing to re-inforce natively held predjudices, rather than arguing to arrive at the truth.

The socratic dialogues are a great example of dealing with this, as well as the conceit of making a committment prior to arguing to be willing to admit error for the sake of arriving at the truth of a discussion.

Establishing this conceit in discussion needs to be habitually brought to dialogue, but it carries a price, that both parties must be willing to concede error, something not always easy to do. Especially given our collective capacity to argue based on motives that are often very subjectively irrational.

I’m not suggesting that rational dialogue isn’t possible, but without establishing the main pitfalls to dialogue, and making a mutual committment to avoid them, what results tends to be a contest of intellectual bullying, rather than a real rational pursuit of the truest-best outcome of a discussion.

Let me re-iterate, those pitfalls tend to arise from each parties subjective motivation for arguing a particular issue. The remedy to this is of course to be able to aknowledge those subjective motivations, set them to the side, and overcome this shortcoming.

Going back to the faith and reason congnitive duality, understanding and agreement are again synonymous with faith, and reason. Faith and reason, are representative of the subjective and objective experience in human life.

One of the key problems in the ‘modern’ world is actually fundamentalism, religious and secular fundamentalism as manifested by christian, jewish, muslim, extremists, and on the secular side by political idealogues who like luddites all look back to ‘the good ole days’, or who espouse dehumanizing machiavellian theories of foreign and domestic policy.

Fundamentalism is itself a pendulum swing away from modernism, which is itself the unbalanced tendency to throw away past ideas and values, on the basis of not needing them because, “we’re modern”, and have ‘outgrown’ such things.  This view often makes far flung assumptions about technology changing hardwired human behavior.  Fundamentalism, and modernism sadly reflect the extreme spectrum of modern thought and behavior.

We are at a period in history were millenialism has run rampant, technological changes and social change have shifted the axis of the world, population density in the east and decline in the west threatens to diminish the power and grandeur of the west.

The new world becomes the old.

In the face of all this change, and modern history-hysteria there is a lemming-like compulsion to look back instead of looking ahead.

It is fitting that we have a resurfacing of mythologies in modern context through Lord of the Rings epics, and comic book heroes. They are age ending stories. These stories resonate at this time because people fear the precipice of uncertainty we are now on at this stage of history.

What these ‘age ending stories reflect however is not ‘The end has come!’, but more to say ‘The age is dead. Long live the age.’.

What is fundamentalism, simply put it is people looking for their foundations, most often out of a sense of having gone astray, and trying to ‘get back to the path’. Sadly however, it often falls into wrong-headed and pessimistic practices.

Sure the modern world has lots of scary bogeymen in it, the Neo-Con Administration of George Bush, numbering among them, but every one of us that innately feels the joy and comfort of good time shared, the joy of sunrise, or tranquility of sunset, the pure ebullient innocence of childhood need only have ‘faith’ in new life, and carry on.

The literal biblical quote that should resonate here for Christians is ‘Sufficient for the day are the troubles therein.” Basically Jesus telling people to live in the moment, instead of worry what tomorrow might bring.

That I suppose is the answer to the fundamentalists, that their fundamentalism actually reflects a lack of faith in their founding vision, and they’re reasoning their way to their roots, but forgetting the faith that has brought them to where they are.

I see women coming in for abortion regularly, for many of them out of sheer laziness, forgetting to fill their perscription, or not bothering, or because they were hammered the night they were ‘getting it on’, knowing they can just go to a hospital and get it done. Rape victims are very very rare, and dilation and curettage are routine protocol, as part of rape treatment, effectively ensuring implantation won’t occur.

I’ve heard doctors and nurses bitch about patients’ abusing their own health, and the medical system. These are complaints not motivated by religious conviction, they are based on medical practictioners shaking their heads at a pracitice too political to speak out against, being used by women kept ignorant of the dangers.

I often see women coming in to the hospital with spontaneous abortion for a ‘wanted’ pregnancy. There is a very high correlation between abortions and later fertility difficulties and problems carrying a child to term, yet these issues cannot be discussed medically, since that would be playing to the ‘pro-life’ argument.

I am addressing these issues today as problems within a medical framework heavily politicized on both sides.
Consider however, that the pharmaceutical industry has a vested interest in promoting contraception, and abortion politically, it is big business.

If I walk today through the maternity wards of almost any hospital in north america, what do you think I’ll find in the fertility and contraception guides provided by the hospital. That the company printing that ‘guide’ is a pharmaceutical company.

I met a couple that had started practicing a natural method of contraception involving observation of the medical symptoms of fertility. This method was originally researched and presented by a husband and wife team, (both Doctors), and has since been improved upon by further medical research and understanding.

Essentially the method consists of observation of the state of the vaginal discharge during the menstrual cycle. It is an extremely effective non-medically-intrusive way to practice contraception, yet this method of contraception gets very little airtime. Do you know why that is ? Because there is no money to be made from it.

Doctors and aid workers have taught this method inside poverty stricken countries to illiterate women and helped them control their pregnancies with an extremely high degree of success, yet the awareness of this program is almost nil.

I’ve used it for 15 years now to plan or avoid my own pregnancies. I know it works, its a basic observation of the medical symptoms of fertility, which are pretty obvious. Why not write that up. Look up ‘Billings Method’, and others like it, natural contraception that does not require lining the pockets of big pharma.

There is a long list of medical side effects to abortion and contraception. I’ve seen young women stroke, and suffer serious DVT (deep vein thrombosis), sometimes with loss of limbs, from prolonged use of the pill and related pharmacological agents. I’ve been on the pill, it was not ‘fun’, and for what, so my boyfriend could screw me with impunity. Yay, what freedom!

I’ve seen women coming in for their 5 or 6th miscarriage, which co-incidentally occurs during the same period of that first trimester abortion they had when they were young. Incidence of miscarriage for a woman with therapeutic abortion in her medical history are extremely high.

In most cases that first pregnancy sets a ‘hormonal template’ for a woman’s body, an interruption of that ‘template’ is ‘remembered’ by the bodies’ hormone systems, vital for managing pregnancy, and later repeated in subsequent pregnancies. How is that ’safer’ or ‘liberating’ for women. Believe it or not, hormone systems do have a ‘high water mark’ feedback methodology that the body ‘remembers.

Often young women aren’t seriously, and regularly warned (except in fine print–for liability reasons) against the contra-indications for contraceptive pharmacology. Why ? Because that might affect sales.

Gynecologists who out of negligence or sheer incompetence, harm or cause the death of women receiving abortions are being protected from malpractice suits for botched abortions, for fear of setting legal precedent. How is that better than the back-alley coathanger scenario so often portrayed ?

I’ve held the hands of women crying their hearts out because they miscarried again and don’t understand. It breaks my heart, I try to comfort them. I want to rail against the doctor that prescribed or surgically performed that string of abortions they had as a teen.

How are these women ‘liberated’. Once again women are victimized, and yes we may have avoided that pregnancy, and gotten our boyfriend ‘off the hook’, but we still get stuck with the consequences. How is that better for women ?

Why don’t you spend some of that passionate invective and social concern looking at the influence the pharmaceutical industry has on the abortion and contraception debate. Or you could look at how the abortion debate is being used as a political wedge by corporate criminals to hamper serious and democratic discussion on many social issues.

I know there are a lot of looney people arguing both sides of the choice-abortion debate, my big concern is that medically this issue is being side stepped because of the politics, and I have to deal with it almost every day, and am not allowed to have any opinion on the abuses I see because the politics of the issue jeopardizes my career.

Thank you for your moral crusade, maybe you should spend some time in an emergency ward holding some hands yourself.

In this context, much of human knowledge is flawed. In the gospel narrative Jesus absolves his tormentors; seen literally as his persecutors and figuratively as the whole human race, by stating “Forgive them Father, they know not what they do”.

Aphorisms about the blind leading the blind seem apt for every period of human history. Gnostic commentators cynically claim that superior knowledge is the basis for their influence in the world. Contemporary provocateurs make similar claims, arguing for the imposition of political ideology ‘by force’.

There is a strange conception of knowledge, that it is immutable to human distortion. The word ‘understanding’ illustrates this well. People often take understanding to mean ‘having a wider view of things’. Understanding, however also refers to the beliefs you ‘stand under’, and the resulting perspectives that flow from that belief.

In the classical world of theology and philosophy, this is often stated as ‘faith’ and ‘reason’, we give reason for what we believe. This is not merely an admonition for good theological, or scholarly conduct, but rather a description of how human ‘knowledge’ operates. We reason ‘from’ our beliefs, reason informs our beliefs, but belief itself is an act of will that operates independant of reason.

It is true that reason also ‘informs’ the things we believe in, occasionally calling us to question those beliefs. This questioning is a fundamental aspect of human nature, or for the Judeo-Christan, ‘fallen’ nature. We question right and wrong, and seem condemned to uncertainty, and doubt.

It is interesting to note, that in the biblical account of creation, the first act of ‘fallen’ man, was to cover himself/herself. The wearing of the fig leaf becoming the first act of self-doubt. We experienced doubt as a consequence of attaining the means to discern right and wrong.

We began our pursuit of knowledge with doubt of ourselves. Doubt of our own nature giving rise to a need to ‘supplement’ that nature with external things. One could, in this context, argue that the first technological device was the fig leaf.

The whole history; allegorical, and literal, of our pursuit of knowledge is nothing more than a series of fig leaves, adopted as a feeble attempt to cover our shame and self-doubt.

Consider the story of Jesus, whose only apparent writing; that we have a record of, was on sand. That is a fitting commentary in itself on the character of human knowledge authority and authenticity.

Welcome to apocryphal times.

PARANOID FANTASIES ABOUT SEPT 11

Astute observers of history are aware that for every notable event there will be at least one, usually several wild conspiracy theories which spring up around it.

“Mahatma Ghandi’s ghost throttled Hendrix”

“Saddam Hussein was breeding an army of genetically modified Yeti”.

“Hitler was half Werewolf”

“Space aliens replaced Nixon with a clone” etc,etc.

The bigger the event, the more ridiculous and more numerous are the fanciful rantings which circulate in relation to it.

So it’s hardly surprising that the events of Sept 11 2001 have spawned their fair share of these ludicrous fairy tales.

And as always, there is – sadly – a small but gullible percentage of the population eager to lap up these tall tales, regardless of facts or rational analysis.

One of the wilder stories circulating about Sept 11, and one that has attracted something of a cult following amongst conspiracy buffs is that it was carried out by 19 fanatical Arab hijackers, masterminded by an evil genius named Osama bin Laden, with no apparent motivation other than that they “hate our freedoms.”

Never a group of people to be bothered by facts, the perpetrators of this cartoon fantasy have constructed an elaborately woven web of delusions and unsubstantiated hearsay in order to promote this garbage across the internet and the media to the extent that a number of otherwise rational people have actually fallen under its spell.

Normally I don’t even bother debunking this kind of junk, but the effect that this paranoid myth is beginning to have requires a little rational analysis, in order to consign it to the same rubbish bin as all such silly conspiracy theories.

These crackpots even contend that the extremist Bush regime was caught unaware by the attacks, had no hand in organizing them, and actually would have stopped them if it had been able to.

Blindly ignoring the stand down of the US air-force, the insider trading on airline stocks – which remains uninvestigated, the complicit behaviour of Bush on the morning of the attacks, the controlled demolition of the WTC, the firing of a missile into the Pentagon and a host of other documented proofs that the Bush regime was behind the attacks, the conspiracy theorists stick doggedly to a silly story about 19 Arab hijackers somehow managing to commandeer 4 planes simultaneously and fly them around US airspace for nearly 2 hours , crashing them into important buildings, without the US intelligence services having any idea that it was coming, and without the Air Force knowing what to do.

The huge difficulties with such a stupid story force them to invent even more stupid stories to distract from its core silliness, and thus it has escalated into a mythic fantasy of truly gargantuan proportions.

It’s difficult to apply rational analysis to such unmitigated stupidity, but that is the task which I take on in this article. However, it should be noted that one of the curious characteristics of conspiracy theorists is that they effortlessly change their so called evidence in response to each aspect which is debunked. As soon as one delusion is unmasked, they simply invent another to replace it, and deny that the first ever existed.

Eventually, when they have turned full circle through this endlessly changing fantasy fog, they then re-invent the original delusion and deny that you ever debunked it, thus beginning the circle once more. This technique is known as “the fruit loop” and saves the conspiracy theorist from ever having to see any of their ideas through to their (il)logical conclusions.

According to the practitioners of the fruit loop, 19 Arabs took over the 4 planes by subduing the passengers and crew through the use of guns, knives ,box cutters and gas, and then used electronic guidance systems which they had smuggled on board to fly the planes to their targets.

The suspension of disbelief required for this outrageous concoction is only for the hard core conspiracy theorist.

For a start, they conveniently skip over the awkward fact that there weren’t any Arabs on the planes.

If there were, one must speculate that they somehow got on board without being filmed by any of the security cameras and without being registered on the passenger lists.

But the curly question of how they are supposed to have got on board is all too mundane for the exciting world of the conspiracy theorist.

With vague mumblings that they must have been using false ID ( but never specifying which IDs they are alleged to have used, or how these were traced to their real identities), they quickly bypass this problem, to relate exciting and sinister tales about how some of the fictitious fiends were actually searched before boarding because they looked suspicious.

However, as inevitably happens with any web of lies, this simply paints them into an even more difficult corner. How are they supposed to have got on board with all that stuff if they were searched ? And if they used gas in a confined space, they would have been affected themselves unless they also had masks in their luggage.

“Excuse me sir, why do you have a box cutter, a gun, a container of gas, a gas mask and an electronic guidance unit in your luggage?”

“A present for your grandmother? Very well sir, on you get.”

“Very strange”, thinks the security officer. “That’s the fourth Arabic man without an Arabic name who just got on board with a knife, gun or box cutter and gas mask. And why does that security camera keep flicking off every time one these characters shows up? Must be one of those days I guess…”

Asking any of these basic questions to a conspiracy theorist is likely to cause a sudden leap to the claim that we know that they were on board because they left a credit card trail for the tickets they had purchased and cars they had rented. So if they used credit cards that identified them, how does that reconcile with the claim that they used false IDs to get on to the plane?

But by this time, the fruit loop is in full swing, as the conspiracy theorist tries to stay one jump ahead of this annoying and awkward rational analysis. They will point to the fact that the hijackers passports were allegedly found at the crash scenes. “So there!” they exalt triumphantly, their fanatical faces lighting up with that deranged look of one who has just a revelation of questionable sanity.

Hmm? So they got on board with false IDs but took their real passports with them? However, by this time the fruit loop has been completely circumnavigated, and the conspiracy theorist exclaims impatiently “Who said anything about false IDs? We know what seats they were sitting in! Their presence is well documented!” And so the whole loop starts again.

“Well, why aren’t they on the passenger lists?”

“You numbskull ! They assumed the identities of other passengers!” And so on…

Finally, out of sheer fascination with this circular method of creative delusion, the rational sceptic will allow them to get away with this loop, in order to move on to the next question, and see what further delights await us in the unravelling of this marvellously stupid story.

“Uh, how come their passports survived fiery crashes that completely incinerated the planes and all the passengers? “

The answer of course is that its just one of those strange co-incidences, those little quirks of fate that do happen from time to time. You know, like the same person winning the lottery four weeks in a row. The odds are astronomical, but these things do happen…

This is another favourite deductive method of the conspiracy theorist. The “improbability drive”, in which they decide upon a conclusion without any evidence whatsoever to suggest it, and then speculate a series of wildly improbable events and unbelievable co-incidences to try to support it, shrugging off the implausibility of each event with the vague assertion that sometimes the impossible happens (just about all the time in their world).

There is a principle called “Occam’s razor” which suggests that in the absence of evidence to the contrary, the simplest explanation is most likely to be correct.

Having for the sake of amusement, allowed them to get away with the silly story of the 19 invisible Arabs, we move on to the question of how they are supposed to have taken over the planes.

Hijacking a plane is not an easy thing to do. Hijacking it without the crew being able to alert Air Traffic Control (ATC ) is almost impossible. The crew needs only to punch in a four digit code to alert ATC to a hijacking. Unconcerned with the awkward question of plausibility, the conspiracy buffs maintain that on that Sept 11, the invisible hijackers took over the plane by the crude method of threatening people with box cutters and knives, shooting and stabbing passengers to try to lure the crew out of the cockpit and spraying gas (after they had attached their masks, obviously). And yet, miraculously they were able to take control of the plane without the crew first getting a chance to punch in the hijacking code.

Not just on one plane, but on all four. At this point in the tale, the conspiracy theorist is again forced to call upon the services of the improbability drive.

So now that our incredibly lucky hijackers have taken control of the planes, all four pilots fly them with breath taking skill and certainty to their fiery end, all four pilots unflinching in their steely resolve for a swift meeting with Allah. Apart from their psychotic hatred of “our freedoms”, it was their fanatical devotion to Islam which enabled them to summon up the iron will for this dreadful deed.

Which is strange, because according to another piece of hearsay peddled by the conspiracy buffs, these guys actually went out drinking and womanizing the night before their great martyrdom, even leaving their Korans in the bar -really impeccable Islamic behaviour – and then got up at 5am the next morning to pull off the greatest covert operation in history. This also requires us to believe that they were even clear headed enough to learn how to fly the huge planes by reading flight manuals in Arabic in the car on the way to the airport. We know this because they supposedly left the flight manuals there for us to find.

It gets better. Their practical training had allegedly been limited to Cessnas and flight simulators, but this was no barrier to the unflinching certainty with which they took over the planes and skilfully guided them to their doom. If they are supposed to have done their flight training with these tools, which would be available just about anywhere in the world, its not clear why they would have decided to risk blowing their cover to US intelligence services by doing the training in Florida, rather than somewhere in the Middle East, but such reasoning is foreign to the foggy world of the conspiracy theorist, too trapped in the constant rotation of the fruit loop to make their unsubstantiated fabrications seem even semi- believable.

Having triumphantly established a circular delusion in support of the mythical Arabs, the conspiracy theorist now confronts the difficult question of why there’s nothing left of the planes. Anybody who has seen the endlessly replayed footage of the second plane going into the WTC will realize that for a plane to instantly blow itself up into nothing like that, it would have to be packed with explosives. Planes do not and cannot blow up into nothing in that manner when they crash.

One only has to slow down the video of the “impact” to see that the so called plane is as phoney as a $3 bill-like a Hollywood action stunt with really bad special effects, the way that it disappears through the wall like a ghost-without breaking off any parts and with no hole appearing until well after the $3 bill has completely disappeared.

But lets humour the conspiracy theorists and suppose that this crude cartoon designed to hide whatever really hit the building was actually a real plane.

Did the mythical Arabs also haul a huge heap of explosives on board, and mange to deploy them in such a manner that they went off in the exact instant of the crash, completely vaporising the plane? This is a little difficult even for the conspiracy theorist, who at this point decides that its easier to invent new laws of physics in order to keep the delusion rolling along.

There weren’t any explosives. It wasn’t an inside job. The plane blew up into nothing from its exploding fuel load!

Remarkable! Sluggishly combustible jet fuel which is basically kerosene, and usually burns at about 400c has suddenly taken on the qualities of a ferociously explosive demolition agent, vaporizing 70 tons of aircraft into a puff of smoke. Never mind that a plane of that size contains around 23 tons of steel and titanium, of which even the melting points are about four times that of the normal combustion temperature of kerosene. And forget about the boiling point of these metals, which is what would be required to vaporize a plane. And then there’s about 47 tons of aluminium to be accounted for. In excess of 15lbs of metal for each gallon of kerosene.

For the conspiracy theorist, such inconvenient facts are vaguely dismissed as “mumbo jumbo”. This convenient little phrase is their answer to just about anything factual or logical. Like a conjurer pulling a rabbit out of a hat, they suddenly become fanatically insistent about the devastating explosive qualities of kerosene, something hitherto completely unknown to science, but just discovered by them, this very minute.

Determinedly ignoring the fact that never before or since in aviation history has a plane vaporised into nothing from an exploding fuel load, the conspiracy theorist relies upon Hollywood images, where the effects are always larger than life, and certainly larger than the intellects of these cretins.

“Its a well known fact that planes blow up into nothing on impact!” they state with pompous certainty. “Watch any Bruce Willis movie!”

“Care to provide any documented examples? If it’s a well known fact, then presumably this well known fact springs from some kind of documentation – other than Bruce Willis movies ?”

At this point the mad but cunning eyes of the conspiracy theorist will narrow as they sense the corner into which they have backed themselves and plan their escape by means of another stunning back flip.

“Ah, but planes have never crashed into buildings before, so there’s no way of telling.” they counter with a sly grin.

“Well, actually planes have crashed into buildings before and since, and not vaporised into nothing.”

“But not big planes, with that much fuel ! “, they shriek in hysterical denial.

“Or that much metal to vaporise. “

“Yes, but not hijacked planes !”

“Are you suggesting that whether the crash is deliberate or accidental affects the combustion qualities of the fuel?”

“Now you’re just being silly”.

Although collisions with buildings are rare, planes frequently crash into mountains, streets, other aircraft, nosedive into the ground, or have bombs planted aboard them, and don’t vaporise into nothing. What’s so special about hitting a building?

But by now, the conspiracy theorist has once again sailed happily around the fruit loop. “Its a well documented fact that planes explode into nothing on impact.”

Effortlessly weaving back and forth between the position that its a “well known fact” and that “its never happened before, so we have nothing to compare it to”, the conspiracy theorist has now convinced themselves (if not too many other people) that the WTC plane was not loaded with explosives, and that the instant vaporisation of the plane in a massive fireball was the same as any other plane crash you might care to mention. Round and round the fruit loop…

But the hurdles which confront the conspiracy theorist are many, and they are now forced to implement even creative more uses for the newly discovered shockingly destructive qualities of kerosene. They have to explain how the Arabs also engineered the elegant vertical collapse of both the WTC towers as well as building 7, and for this awkward fact the easiest counter is to simply deny that it was a controlled demolition, and claim that the buildings collapsed from fire caused by the burning kerosene.

This makes it necessary to sweep aside the second law of thermodynamics and propose kerosene which is not only impossibly destructive, but also recycles itself for a second burning in violation of the law of degradation of energy. You see, it not only consumed itself in a sudden catastrophic fireball , vaporising a 70 ton plane into nothing, but then came back for a second go, burning at 2000C for another hour at the impact point, melting the skyscraper’s steel like butter. And while it was doing all this it also poured down the elevator shafts starting fires all through the building. When I was at school there a little thing called the entropy law which suggests that a given portion of fuel can only burn once, something which is readily observable in the real world, even for those who didn’t make it to junior high school science. But this is no problem for the conspiracy theorist. Their insane eyes glinting madly, they claim that a few thousand gallons of kerosene is enough to

: completely vaporise a 70 ton aircraft

: have enough left over to burn so ferociously for over an hour at the impact point that it melted massive steel construction beams ( melting point about double the maximum combustion temperature of the fuel ).

: still have enough left over to pour down the elevator shafts and start similarly destructive fires all through the building.

Kerosene really is remarkable stuff! How chilling to realize that those kerosene heaters we had in the house when I was a kid were deadly bombs, just waiting to go off. One false move and the entire street might have been vaporised. And never again will I take kerosene lamps out camping. One moment you’re there innocently holding the lamp – the next – kapow! Vaporised into nothing – along with the rest of the camp site – with still enough of the deadly stuff left to start a massive forest fire.

These whackos are actually claiming that the mythical raging inferno allegedly created by this miraculously recycling, and impossibly hot burning kerosene melted or at least softened the steel supports of the skyscraper. Oblivious to the fact that the smoke coming from the WTC was black, which indicates an oxygen starved fire -therefore not particularly hot, they trumpet an alleged temperature in the building of 2000 C , without a shred of evidence to support this curious suspension of the laws of physics.

Not content with this ludicrous garbage, they then contend that as the steel girders softened they came straight down instead of buckling and twisting and falling sideways.

Since they’re already re-engineered the combustion qualities of kerosene, violated the second law of thermodynamics, and re-invented the structural properties of steel, why let a little thing like the laws of gravity get in the way?

All three buildings fell in a time almost identical to that of a free falling object, dropped from that height, meaning that its physically impossible for it to have collapsed by the method of the top floors smashing through the lower floors. But according to the conspiracy theorists, the laws of gravity were temporarily suspended on the morning of Sept 11.

It appears that the evil psychic power of those dreadful Arabs knows no bounds. Even after they were dead, they were able, by the power of their evil spirits, to force down the towers at a speed physically impossible under the laws of gravity, had it been meeting any resistance from fireproofed steel structures, originally designed to withstand many tons of hurricane force wind as well as the impact of a large passenger jet straying off course.

Clearly, these conspiracy nuts never did their science homework at school, but did become extremely adept at inventing tall tales for why.

“Muslim terrorists stole my notes, sir”

“No miss, the kerosene heater blew up and vaporised everything in the street, except for my passport.”

“You see sir, the school bus was hijacked by Arabs who destroyed my homework because they hate our freedoms.”

Or perhaps they misunderstood the term “creative science” and mistakenly thought that coming up with such rubbish was in fact, their science homework.

The ferocious heat generated by the ghastly kerosene was, according to the conspiracy theorists, the reason why so many of the WTC victims can’t be identified. DNA is destroyed by such heat. This is quite remarkable, because according to the conspiracy theorist, the nature of DNA suddenly changes if you go to a different city. That’s right! If you are killed by an Arab terrorist in NY, your DNA will be destroyed by such temperatures. But if you are killed by an Arab terrorist in Washington DC, your DNA will be so robust that it can survive temperatures which completely vaporise a 70 ton aircraft.

You see, these loonies have somehow concocted the idea that the missile which hit the pentagon was not a missile at all, but one of the hijacked planes. And to prove this unlikely premise, they point to a propaganda statement from the Bush regime, which rather stupidly claims that all but one of the people aboard the plane were identified from the site by DNA testing, even though nothing remains of the plane. The plane was vaporised by the fuel tank explosion, maintain these space loonies, but the people inside it were all but one identified by DNA testing.

So there you have it. The qualities of DNA are different, depending upon which city you’re in, or perhaps depending upon which fairy story you’re trying to sell at any particular time.

This concoction about one of the hijacked planes hitting the Pentagon really is a howler. For those not familiar with the layout of the Pentagon, it consists of 5 rings of building, each with a space in between of lower building height. Each ring of building is about 30 to 35 ft deep, with a similar depth of lower level space between the rings.

The missile which the Bush regime fired into it, went in at about a 45 degree angle, punching a neat hole less than 20 ft wide, less than 20 ft high through three rings-about 250 ft into the building

A little later a section of wall about 65 ft wide collapsed in the outer ring. Since the plane which the conspiracy theorists claim to be responsible for the impact had a wing span of 125 ft and a length of 155 ft , and a tail height of 40 ft, and there was no wreckage of the plane, either inside or outside the building, and the lawns outside were still smooth and green enough to play golf on, this crazy delusion is clearly physically impossible.

But hey, we’ve already disregarded the combustion qualities of kerosene, the properties of DNA, the laws of gravity, the second law of thermodynamics, and invented imaginary properties for building materials, so what the hell – why not throw in a little spatial impossibility as well ?

I would have thought that the observation that a solid object cannot pass through another solid object without leaving a hole at least as big as itself is reasonably sound science. But to the conspiracy nut, this is “mumbo jumbo”. It conflicts with their mad delusion, so it must be wrong although trying to get then to explain the specifics of how it could be wrong is a futile endeavour.

Conspiracy nuts fly into a curious panic whenever the Pentagon missile is mentioned. They shriek that the plane was vaporised by it’s exploding fuel load and point to the WTC crash as evidence of this behaviour.

(Fruit loop warning !! )

Like an insect which has just been sprayed, running back and forth in its last mad death throes, they first argue that the reason the hole is so small is that plane never entered the wall, having blown up outside, and then suddenly back flip to explain the 250 ft deep missile hole by saying that the plane disappeared all the way into the building, and then blew up inside the building (even though the building shows no sign of such damage).

As for what happened to the wings – here’s where they get really creative. The wings snapped off and folded into the fuselage which then carried them into the building, which then closed up behind the plane like a piece of meat.

When it suits them they’ll also claim that the plane slid in on its belly, (ignoring the undamaged lawn) while at the same time citing alleged witnesses to the plane diving steeply into the building from above. How they reconcile these two scenarios as being compatible is truly a study in stupidity.

Once they get desperate enough, you can be sure that the UFO conspiracy stuff will make an appearance. The Arabs are in league with the Martians. Space aliens snatched the remains of the Pentagon plane and fixed most of the hole in the wall, just to confuse people. They gave the Arabs invisibility pills to help get them onto the planes. Little green men were seen were seen talking to Bin Laden a few weeks prior to the attacks.

As the nation gears up to impeach the traitor Bush, and prevent his endless war, it’s not helpful to have these idiots distracting from the process by spreading silly conspiracy theories about mythical Arabs, stories which do nothing but play into the hands of the extremist Bush regime.

At a less serious time, we might tolerate such crackpots with amused detachment, but they need to understand that the treachery which was perpetrated on Sept 11, and the subsequent war crimes committed in “retaliation” are far too serious for us to allow such frivolous self indulgence to go unchallenged.

Those who are truly addicted to conspiracy delusions should find a more appropriate outlet for their paranoia.

It’s time to stop the loony conspiracy theories about Sept 11.

In general those furtive few are brow beaten into compliant silence by accusations of being 'conspiracy theorists', while the rest are in the 'I don't scatter pearls before swine', mode and will only whisper in hushed tones with other members of the 'conspiracy elect'.

The events surrounding Plamegate left me wondering early on. "Who is this 'Joe Wilson', character anyway" ? He seems to have stirred up quite a fuss for the seemingly criminally inclined Bush/Neo-Con administration, which to all appearances is quite capable of underhandedness, it seems hard to believe that it was 'single-handedly'.

I'm sure that there are theories that deepen the plot, such as those listed in CitizenSpook, or Rigorous Intuition, but without putting too deep a claim to those ideas, I wonder if the small fish are being handed over in what might be a bigger game.

Given the alleged potential for criminal activity, lies, intimidation and murder/suicide/accidental death amongst those with machiavellian inclination, it seems a wonder to me that a single prosecutorial appointee could dig so deep into the vipers nest without getting bitten.

This curious invincibility of Patrick Fitzgerald leaves me wondering if he has a larger/bigger viper protecting him from the smaller snakes of Washington. Didn't someone mention Washington being a swamp.

Personally I find it difficult to believe that justice, truth and honesty will prevail, out of the thoroughly corrupted apparatus of U.S. Gov't and its various estates. In the larger sense I am optimistic of providence in human affairs, but in the short term I'm not holding my breath to see 'justice' finally govern in U.S. politics.